Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 189

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David Folsom : Motion Hearing held on 1/31/2005 re 91 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(7) or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) filed by Onkyo USA Corporation,, 44 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer filed by Concord Camera Corporation,, Creative Labs Incorporated,, 45 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion to Transfer filed by Xerox Corporation,, Eastman Kodak Company,, Hewlett-Packard Company,, Fujitsu Computer Products of America Inc,, Matsushita Electric Corporation of America,, JASC Software, Inc,, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America Inc,, Fuji Photo Film USA Inc,, Ricoh Corporation,, Thomson Inc,, Agfa Corporation,, Apple Computer Incorporated,, Axis Communications Incorporated,, Canon USA Incorporated,, Gateway Incorporated,, JVC Americas Corporation,, Kyocera Wireless Corporation,, Macromedia Incorporated,, Oce North America Incorporated,, PalmOne Incorporated,, Panasonic Communications Corporation of America,, Panasonic Mobile Communications Development Corporation of USA,, Riverdeep Incorporated,, Savin Corporation,, Thomson S A,. (Court Reporter Libby Crawford.) (mrm, ) Modified on 2/1/2005 (mrm, ).

Download PDF
Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 189 Case 2:04-cv-00158-DF Document 189 Filed 01/31/2005 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS M A RSHA LL DIVISION TIM E 10:00 (OPEN) J UDGE David Folsom COM PRESSION LABS V. § § § § § § DATE 1/31/05 REPORTER Libby Craw f ord A CER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:04CV294 2:04CV158 2:04CV159 MOTION HEARING A TTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: Eric Buether; Carl Roth; Michael Smith; ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT: Eric Albritton; Lance Lee; Danny Williams; Jennifer Doan; David Hansen; David Weaver; LAW CLERK: Peter Corcoran and Trip Fussell THIS DAY CAME THE PARTIES BY THEIR ATTORNEYS AND THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS WERE HAD: 9;27 ct opens; 9:30 Williams/ add ct, oral argument on 2:04cv158, 2:04cv159, and 2 : 0 4 cv 2 9 4 cases; 9:55 Buether/ responds; 10:12 Williams/ reply; 10:17 Hansen/ add ct re: Yahoo and Sun (2:04-cv-294) dismissal and transfers; 10:29 Smith/ responds; 10:31 ct/ w hat does that leave us w it h; 10:31 Lee/ w ould like to discuss scheduling issues; 10:32 ct/ 10 minute break; 10:32 recess; 10:48 ICC w it h Hansen, W illiams, Lee, Buet her, and Weaver; Buether/ has w it hdraw n bifurcation issue; ct/ Special Master or Technical Advisor; Buether/ responds; ct/ w ill not decide that until af t er MDL; 10:51 ct/ 400 hrs for deposition; Weaver/ 4/6th tutorial and 4/7th m ark m an; 10:52 ct/ schedule for next 60 days and early April is pushing it for M ark m an hrg; Weaver/ w ould like to pencil in something; ct/ w ill give 2 hrs 45 mins ea side for Markman hrg; ct/ sets tutorials for 4/27th 10:00 am 1.5 hrs each side and 4 / 2 8 t h 9:00 am Markman hrg 2 hrs 45 mins; 10:57 Lee/ experts issue; ct/ w ill not lim it at this time but be reasonable; 11:10 recess; 11:12 ct resumes; ct/ plfs not pursuing bifurcat ion claim; 4/27th for tutorial 1 ½ hrs ea side; 4/28th at 9:00 am M arkm an hrg 2 hrs 45 mins each side; Weaver/ w ill submit a revised scheduling order; Buet her/ housekeeping; protective order in 158 and one proposed in other 2 cases; ct/ can that protective order be extended to all the cases; Roth/ that protective order w as negot iat ed; Buether/ add ct; ct/ add ptys re: consolidation for discovery purposes and if ptys feel consolidation is needed for trial then notify ct as soon as possible; ct/ can Prot ect iv e order from 158 be extended to all cases; Weaver/ at a substantive level they are the same; ct/ if some modifications needed w e can address those at the appropriat e time; 11:18 recess; Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00158-DF Document 189 Filed 01/31/2005 Page 2 of 2 DAVID J. MALAND, CLERK BY: Mel Martin Courtroom Deputy TIM E: 11:18 (ADJOURN)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?