Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 76

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Panasonic Mobile Communications Development Corporation of USA (Albritton, Eric)

Download PDF
Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 76 Case 2:04-cv-00158-DF Document 76 Filed 07/28/2004 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Compression Labs, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Agfa Corporation, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:04-CV-158-DF PANASONIC MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF USA'S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Panasonic Mobile Communications Development Corporation of USA, defendant in the above-entitled and numbered civil action, discloses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a) that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Panasonic Mobile Communications Co., Ltd., which itself is a division of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., which is a Japanese corporation. No other corporation owns 10 percent or more of its stock Respectfully submitted, Eric M. Albritton Attorney-in-Charge Texas State Bar No. 00790215 P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) eric@albrittonlawfirm.com 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00158-DF Document 76 Filed 07/28/2004 Page 2 of 2 Of Counsel: Morton Amster New York Registration No. 1193689 mamster@arelaw.com Abraham Kasdan New York Registration No. 2040772 akasdan@arelaw.com Joseph Casino New York Registration No. 2835338 jcasino@arelaw.com David A. Boag New York Registration No. 4052486 dboag@arelaw.com Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP 90 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016 (212) 336-8000 (phone) (212) 336-8001 (fax) Counsel for Panasonic Mobile Communications Development Corporation of USA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on this the 28th day of July, 2004. Eric M. Albritton 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?