Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Filing
216
Additional Attachments to Main Document: #210 Response to Motion,.. (Bruster, Anthony)
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 216
Filed 06/23/2006
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION PLAINTIFF v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al DEFENDANTS § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06CV72
AFFIDAVIT OF ANTHONY K. BRUSTER
STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BOWIE
§ § §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned notary public, on this day personally appeared before me Anthony K. Bruster who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath stated as follows: 1. My name is Anthony K. Bruster. I am over the age of 18 and competent to make
this affidavit. I am an attorney at NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP, counsel for DataTreasury Corporation in this action. I am a member of good standing of the State Bars of Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico, and admitted to practice in this District. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Affidavit. 2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of relevant portions of HSBC
Holdings plc's 2005 20-F SEC Filing. The relevant portions have been accurately explained in the body of the Response filed with this Affidavit. 3. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a printout of the web address The relevant portions have been accurately
www.csrwire.com/print.cgi?sfArticleId=56666.
explained in the body of the Response filed with this Affidavit.
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 216
Filed 06/23/2006
Page 2 of 3
4.
Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Now The relevant
Using SVPCo Image Payments Network, PR Newswire US dated 02/02/06 .
portions have been accurately explained in the body of the Response filed with this Affidavit. 5. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Checks Not in the Mail; New
Technology Will Eliminate Return of Canceled Checks, Buffalo News dated 08/16/03. The relevant portions have been accurately explained in the body of the Response. 6. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a printout of the web address The relevant portions have been
www.hsbcusa.com/ourcompany/linesofbusiness.html.
accurately explained in the body of the Response filed with this Affidavit. 7. Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated July 16, 2004 to
the SEC, Federal Reserve System, and other government agencies. The relevant portions have been accurately explained in the body of the Response filed with this Affidavit. 8. Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of an Order filed November 16,
2004 in DataTreasury vs. SVPCo. 9. Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a printout of the web address The relevant portions have been accurately
www.theclearninghouse.org/about/000211f.php.
explained in the body of the Response filed with this Affidavit. 10. Further Affiant sayeth not.
ANTHONY K. BRUSTER
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Affidavit of Anthony K. Bruster Page 2
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 216
Filed 06/23/2006
Page 3 of 3
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, a Notary Public, on this 23rd day of June, 2006.
_____________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: November 22, 2007
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Affidavit of Anthony K. Bruster Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?