Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 283

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Harry Lee Gillam, Jr on behalf of UBS Americas, Inc. (Gillam, Harry)

Download PDF
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al Doc. 283 Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 283 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WELL FARGO & COMPANY, ET AL. Defendant. § § § § § § § § § C. A. No. 2:06cv72-DF NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT UBS AMERICAS, INC. Notice is hereby given that Harry L. Gillam, Jr. of Gillam & Smith, LLP enters his appearance on behalf of Defendant UBS AMERICANS, INC., in this matter as additional counsel. Harry L. Gillam, Jr. may receive all communications from the Court and from other parties at Gillam & Smith, LLP, 303 South Washington Avenue, Marshall, Texas 75670; Telephone: (903) 934-8450; Facsimile: (903) 934-9257. Respectfully submitted, GILLAM & SMITH, LLP /s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr. State Bar No. 07921800 GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P. 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 Email: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 283 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 2 of 2 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, UBS AMERICANS, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this notice was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on this the 6th day of October, 2006. /s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?