Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 286

ORDER granting #275 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #260 MOTION to Sever MOTION to Stay MOTION OF DEFENDANTS EDS, HARRIS, KEY, PNC AND SUNTRUST TO SEVER AND STAY THE CLAIMS RELATING TO THE BALLARD PATENTS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE BALLARD PATENTS MOTION to Sever MOTION to Stay MOTION OF DEFENDANTS EDS, HARRIS, KEY, PNC AND SUNTRUST TO SEVER AND STAY THE CLAIMS RELATING TO THE BALLARD PATENTS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE BALLARD PATENTS MOTION to Sever MOTION to Stay MOTION OF DEFENDANTS EDS, HARRIS, KEY, PNC AND SUNTRUST TO SEVER AND STAY THE CLAIMS RELATING TO THE BALLARD PATENTS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE BALLARD PATENTS Responses due by 10/11/2006. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/5/06. (mrm, )

Download PDF
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 286 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 ofof 1 Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF Document 275-2 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al. Defendants § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-72 Judge David Folsom ORDER Before the Court is DataTreasury's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Motion of Defendants EDS, Harris, Key, PNC, and Suntrust to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination of the Ballard Patents. Having considered DataTreasury's Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that DataTreasury is allowed up to and including . Wednesday, October 11, 2006 in which to file its Response to Motion of Defendants EDS, Harris, Key, PNC, and Suntrust to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination of the Ballard Patents. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 5th day of October, 2006. ____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?