Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Filing
387
NOTICE of Disclosure by Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD (Lee, Lance)
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Doc. 387
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 387
Filed 12/05/2006
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § §
Civil Action No. 5:06-CV-72
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 26(a)(1) BY DEFENDANT BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and Local Rule CV-26(c), Defendant Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. hereby notifies the Court that it has served the Plaintiff's counsel with its Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures on December 4, 2006. Dated: December 5, 2006 /s/ Lance Lee Lance Lee State Bar No. 240004762 YOUNG, PICKETT & LEE 4122 Texas Boulevard Texarkana, Texas 75503-1897 Tel: (903) 794-1303 Fax: (903) 792-5098 Jeffrey A. Finn (Pro Hac Vice) Carissa A. Tener (Pro Hac Vice) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90013-1010 Tel: (213) 896-6000 Fax: (213) 896-6600
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 387
Filed 12/05/2006
Page 2 of 2
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy via email transmission, facsimile and/or U.S. Mail this 5th day of December, 2006. _/s/ LanceLee________________________
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?