Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 662

DataTreasury Corporation's ANSWER to Counterclaim (Amended) of Bank of New York and Bank of New York Company, Inc. by Datatreasury Corporation.(Hohn, Edward)

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Doc. 662

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 662

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORTION § Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant § § vs. § § WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; § WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL § ASSOCIATION § Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff §

No. 2:06cv72 (DF) Jury Trial Demanded

DATATREASURY'S ANSWER TO THE BANK OF YORK AND THE BANK OF NEW YORK COMPANY, INC.'S FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant DataTreasury Corporation hereby files its Answer to The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Company, Inc.'s (collectively "BNY") First Amended Counterclaims to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and in support thereof, states as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant admits the allegations contained in paragraphs 101

through 105 of BNY's Counterclaim. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or

deny the allegations contained in paragraph 106 of BNY's Counterclaim. 3. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant admits the allegations in paragraphs 107 thru 109 of

BNY's Counterclaim.

DataTreasury's Answer to First Amended Counterclaim by BNY

Page 1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 662

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 2 of 5

COUNTERCLAIM ONE: INVALIDITY OF THE `007 PATENT 4. In paragraph 110 of Defendants' First Amended Counterclaim, BNY has

incorporated Paragraphs 93 through 100 of Defendant's First Amended Answer which are affirmative defenses by Defendant BNY for which Defendant has the burden of proof, and no response is required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. However, in the event any response would be required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, DataTreasury Corporation responds to each of the affirmative defenses contained in paragraphs 93 through 100 as denied. 5. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant denies the allegations contained in paragraph 111 of

BNY's First Amended Counterclaim. COUNTERCLAIM TWO: NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE `007 PATENT 6 In paragraph 112 of Defendants' First Amended Counterclaim, BNY has

incorporated Paragraphs 93 through 100 of Defendant's First Amended Answer which are affirmative defenses by Defendant BNY for which Defendant has the burden of proof, and no response is required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. However, in the event any response would be required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, DataTreasury Corporation responds to each of the affirmative defenses contained in paragraphs 93 through 100 as denied. 7. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant denies the allegations contained in paragraph 113 of

BNY's First Amended Counterclaim. COUNTERCLAIM THREE: INVALIDITY OF THE `868 PATENT 8. In paragraph 114 of Defendants' First Amended Counterclaim, BNY has

incorporated Paragraphs 93 through 100 of Defendant's First Amended Answer which

DataTreasury's Answer to First Amended Counterclaim by BNY

Page 2

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 662

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 3 of 5

are affirmative defenses by Defendant BNY for which Defendant has the burden of proof, and no response is required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. However, in the event any response would be required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, DataTreasury Corporation responds to each of the affirmative defenses contained in paragraphs 93 through 100 as denied. 9. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant denies the allegations contained in paragraph 115 of

BNY's First Amended Counterclaim. COUNTERCLAIM FOUR: NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE `868 PATENT 10. In paragraph 116 of Defendants' First Amended Counterclaim, BNY has

incorporated Paragraphs 93 through 100 of Defendant's First Amended Answer which are affirmative defenses by Defendant BNY for which Defendant has the burden of proof, and no response is required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant. However, in the event any response would be required by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, DataTreasury Corporation responds to each of the affirmative defenses contained in paragraphs 93 through 100 as denied. 11. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant denies the allegations contained in paragraph 117 of

BNY's Counterclaim. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant prays for judgment against

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs as follows: A. For judgment dismissing the counterclaims with prejudice;

DataTreasury's Answer to First Amended Counterclaim by BNY

Page 3

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 662

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 4 of 5

B.

For a declaration that this is an exceptional case, and an award to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant of its costs and attorneys' fees incurred herein;

C. D.

An award of the costs of this action; and That Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant be awarded such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper, including all relief requested in Plaintiff's Complaint. Respectfully submitted, ____________/S/_____________________
EDWARD L. V ON HOHN, Attorney in Charge State Bar No. 09813240 ROD COOPER State Bar No. 90001628 EDWARD CHIN STATE BAR NO. 50511688 NIX PATTERSON & ROACH LLP 5215 N. O'Connor Blvd. Ste. 1900 Irving, Texas 75039 972.831.1188 (telephone) 972.692.5445 (facsimile) [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] C. CARY PATTERSON State Bar No. 15587000 BRADY PADDOCK State Bar No. 00791394 ANTHONY BRUSTER State Bar No. 24036280 R. BENJAMIN KING State Bar No. 24048592 NIX PATTERSON & ROACH L.L.P. 2900 St. Michael Drive, Suite 500 Texarkana, Texas 75503 903.223.3999 (telephone) 903.223.8520 (facsimile) [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

DataTreasury's Answer to First Amended Counterclaim by BNY

Page 4

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 662

Filed 04/17/2007

Page 5 of 5

JOE KENDALL State Bar No. 11260700 KARL RUPP State Bar No. 24035243 PROVOST * UMPHREY, L.L.P. 3232 McKinney Avenue, Ste. 700 Dallas, Texas 75204 214.744.3000 (telephone) 214.744.3015 (facsimile) [e-mail] [e-mail] ERIC M. ALBRITTON State Bar ;No. 00790215 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 903.757.8449 (telephone) 903.758.7397 (facsimile) [e-mail] T. JOHN WARD, JR. State Bar No. 00794818 LAW OFFICE OF T. JOHN WARD, JR. P.O. Box 1231 Longview, Texas 75601 903.757.6400 (telephone) 903.757.2323 (facsimile) [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANT,DATATREASURY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on all counsel of record, via CM/ECF, on the 17th day of April, 2007.

___________/S/______________________ Edward Lewis von Hohn

DataTreasury's Answer to First Amended Counterclaim by BNY

Page 5