Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Filing
748
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF filed by Keycorp, Keybank National Association, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., PNC Bank, National Association. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Geoffrey L. Smith#2 Exhibit A#3 Exhibit B#4 Exhibit C#5 Exhibit D#6 Exhibit E#7 Exhibit F#8 Exhibit G#9 Exhibit H#10 Exhibit I#11 Exhibit J#12 Exhibit K#13 Exhibit L)(Baxter, Samuel)
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Doc. 748 Att. 1
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 748
Filed 07/10/2007
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORP., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al. Defendants. _______________________________________ § § § § § § § § §
No. 2:06-CV-72 Judge David Folsom
DECLARATION I, Geoffrey L. Smith, declare: 1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of Texas and admitted to
practice in this District. I am an associate in the law firm of McKool Smith, P.C., and an attorney of record in this matter for Defendants KeyBank National Association, KeyCorp, PNC Bank National Association, and the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. The following
declaration is based on my personal knowledge. If called as a witness I could and would competently testify to the facts set forth below. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a chart listing a subset of the disputed claim terms
by patent and providing side-by-side comparisons of the parties' respective constructions of those terms. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
5,717,868 (the "`868 patent"). 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment and Response of June 13, 1997--a portion of the prosecution history of the `868 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Austin 38302v1
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 748
Filed 07/10/2007
Page 2 of 3
patent. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
5,265,007 (the "`007 patent"). 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment of May 13, 1991--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment of May 29, 1991--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment of January 2, 1992--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment of May 14, 1992--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment of December 8, 1992--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's
Amendment After Final Action and Statement of May 5, 1993--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of the Applicant's Second
Amendment After Final Action and Statement of June 29, 1993--a portion of the prosecution history of the `007 patent. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit L are true and correct copies of definitions drawn from
the following dictionaries: Banking Terminology (1996), The Dictionary of Banking (1994), The International Dictionary of Data Communications (1998), Random House Webster's Computer & Internet Dictionary (1999), Webster's New World Dictionary of Computer Terms
Austin 38302v1
2
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 748
Filed 07/10/2007
Page 3 of 3
(1997), and Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (1996). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 9th day of July in Austin, Texas. /s/ Geoffrey L. Smith Geoffrey L. Smith
Austin 38302v1
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?