Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al

Filing 92

NOTICE by Zebec Data Systems, Inc. re 62 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Supplement to Consolidated Motion to Dismiss on Common Issues (Moos, Marvin)

Download PDF
Taylor et al v. Acxiom Corporation et al Doc. 92 Case 2:07-cv-00001 Document 92 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SHARON TAYLOR, ET AL. VERSUS ACXIOM CORPORATION, ET AL. AND SHARON TAYLOR, ET AL. VERSUS ACS STATE & LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. AND SHARON TAYLOR, ET AL. VERSUS TEXAS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. AND SHARON TAYLOR, ET AL. VERSUS SAFEWAY, INC., ET AL. AND SHARON TAYLOR, ET AL. VERSUS BIOMETRIC ACCESS COMPANY, ET AL. AND SHARON TAYLOR, ET AL. VERSUS FREEMAN PUBLISHING COMPANY ZEBEC DATA SYSTEMS, INC.'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENT TO CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS ON COMMON ISSUES CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv00410 JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv00018 JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv00017 JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv00014 JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv00013 JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv00001 JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00001 Document 92 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 2 of 5 Zebec Data Systems, Inc. ("Zebec") files this Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Supplement to Consolidated Motion to Dismiss on Common Issues and will demonstrate that this Court should dismiss all claims against Zebec. ARGUMENT Zebec joined in the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss on Common Issues and Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Violations ("Consolidated Motion") filed on April 18, 2008. This Consolidated Motion set forth numerous bases for the Court to dismiss this lawsuit. Zebec also filed a separate Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Violations of the Drivers' Privacy Protection Act and Supplement to Consolidated Motion to Dismiss on Common Issues ("Zebec's Supplement"). Zebec's Supplement pointed out that its motion to dismiss included all grounds in the Consolidated Motion, as well as the ground that Plaintiffs are impermissibly contesting Zebec's certification to the State of Texas that it acquired motor vehicle records for purposes permitted by the DPPA. Plaintiffs filed a separate Response to Zebec's Supplement contending that Zebec did not raise "any issues that were not addressed in Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Consolidated Motion to Dismiss on Common Issues" and only made "boilerplate" allegations in the Supplement (Plaintiffs' Resp. at 1). Zebec files this Reply to emphasize that it made no "boilerplate" allegations in either its motion to dismiss or in its supplemental response; rather, Zebec emphasized that it seeks dismissal based on all grounds in its motion to dismiss and in the Consolidated Motion, as well as the ground that the Plaintiffs are impermissibly attacking Zebec's certification to the State of Texas. The DPPA does not authorize this. Zebec also joins the Consolidated Reply on behalf of all Defendants filed separately. 2 Case 2:07-cv-00001 Document 92 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 3 of 5 CONCLUSION For the above reasons, the reasons set forth in Zebec Data Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Reply, and the reasons in the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss and Consolidated Reply, the Court should dismiss Plaintiffs' claims against it with prejudice and award Zebec Data Systems, Inc. such other and further relief to which it is entitled, including costs. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Marvin C. Moos MARVIN C. MOOS State Bar No.: 14413900 1301 McKinney, Suite 2700 Houston, Texas 77010-3079 TELEPHONE: 713/333-4500 FACSIMILE: 713/333-4600 ATTORNEY-IN-CHARGE FOR DEFENDANT, ZEBEC DATA SYSTEMS, INC. OF COUNSEL: EBANKS, SMITH & CARLSON, L.L.P. 1301 McKinney, Suite 2700 Houston, Texas 77010-3079 TELEPHONE: 713/333-4500 FACSIMILE: 713/333-4600 3 Case 2:07-cv-00001 Document 92 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the May 15, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification to the following: Elizabeth E. Baker Philip John BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Suite 3000 Houston, TX 77002 Jason R. Searcy Amy Bates Ames Joshua P. Searcy JASON R. SEARCY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. P.O. Box 3929 Longview, TX 75606 Thomas Mathew Corea Jeremy Reade Wilson The Corea Firm, PLLC 325 N St Paul St Suite 4150 Dallas, TX 75201 James Mark Mann The Mann Firm 300 W. Main Henderson, TX 75652 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS Alan Neil Greenspan Luke Ellis Jackson Walker 901 Main St., Suite 6000 Dallas, TX 75202-3797 James M. Walls CARLTON FIELDS, PA P.O. Box 3239 Tampa, FL 33601-3239 COUNSEL FOR CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC. d/b/a Equifax Payment Services, Inc. and FINANCIAL, INC. Robert M Strasnick Andrews & Updegraph 70 Washington St., Suite 212 Salem, MA 01970 COUNSEL FOR JON LATORELLA Neal W. Hardin Attorney at Law 1150 Lakeway Drive Chad M. Pinson Suite 101 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. Austin, TX 78734 2001 Ross Avenue COUNSEL FOR Dallas, TX 75201-2980 COUNSEL FOR AMERICAN REALTIME-ID, LP DRIVING RECORDS, INC. D/B/A FIRST ADVANTAGE ADR, A/K/A AGENCY RECORDS, INC. Brent Samuel Lee Craig Alan Haynes Thompson & Knight LLP 1700 Pacific Ave., Suite 3300 Dallas, TX 75201 COUNSEL FOR LML PAYMENT SYSTEMS CORP. John E. Collins SBN: 04613000 Burleson, Pate & Gibson 2414 N. Akard, Ste. 700 Dallas, Texas 75201 COUNSEL FOR URAPI Brian C. Jobe Wimer & Jobe 13455 Noel Rd., Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75251 Michael G. Wimer Wimer & Jobe 349 Haywood Rd. Asheville, NC 28806 COUNSEL FOR ALLIED RESIDENT/EMPLOYEE SCREENING SERVICE Michael L. Bernoudy, Jr. The Benoudy Law Firm 2660 E. End Blvd. S., Suite 110 Marshall, TX 75672 COUNSEL FOR COE INFORMATION PUBLISHERS, INC. Brett Lee Myers David Goodman & Madole 5420 LBJ Freeway Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75240 COUNSEL FOR ATM CONNECTION, INC. 4 Case 2:07-cv-00001 Document 92 Filed 05/15/2008 Page 5 of 5 Jeffrey R. Elkin PORTER & HEDGES 1000 Main Street, 36th Floor Houston, TX 77002 COUNSEL FOR PROPERTYINFO CORPORATION Robert Langdon Ramey Ramey & Chandler 750 Bering Dr. Suite 600 Houston, TX 77057 COUNSEL PRO SE FOR SOURCE DATA, INC. Kyle W Johnson David Goodman & Madole 5420 LBJ Freeway Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75240 COUNSEL FOR TML INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. Tristan Belew Ellis T. Belew Ellis P. O. Box 802 Marshall, TX 75671-0802 COUNSEL FOR MARSHALL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. Jennifer Haltom Doan Joshua R. Thane Haltom & Doan Crown Executive Center Suite 1 A 6500 Summerhill Road Texarkana, TX 75503 Randall K. Miller Michelle Killick Arnold & Porter LLP 1600 Tysons Boulevard Suite 900 McLean, VA 22102-4865 COUNSEL FOR BIOMETIC ACCESS COMPANY and MIDWEST DATA CENTER, INC. Walter J. Cicack Karl E. Neudorfer SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 700 Louisiana Street Suite 3700 Houston, TX 77002 Michael Charles Smith The Roth Law Firm 115 N. Wellington Suite 200 P.O. Box 876 Marshall, TX 75671-0876 COUNSEL FOR U.S. INTERACTIVE, INC. James Patrick Kelley Ireland Carroll & Kelley 6101 S Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703 COUNSEL FOR ACXIOM RISK MITIGATION, INC. S. Calvin Capshaw Elizabeth L. DeRieux CAPSHAW DERIEUX, LLP Energy Centre P.O. Box 3999 Longview, TX 75606-3999 David G. Russell Jodi E. Zysek PARKER, HUDSON, RAINER & DOBBS, LLP 1500 Marquis Two Tower 285 Peachtree Center Ave. NE Atlanta, GA 30303 COUNSEL FOR TELECHECK SERVICES, INC. Robin Leaf Harrison CAMPBELL HARRISON & DAGLEY, L.L.P. 4000 Two Houston, Center 909 Fannin Houston, TX 77010 COUNSEL FOR ADP SCREENING AND SELECTION SERVICES, INC. A/K/A AVERT, INC. John E. Collins Burleson, Pate & Gibson 2414 N, Akard, Ste. 700 Dallas, Texas 75201 COUNSEL FOR URAPI Douglas E. Koger 14090 Southwest Freeway Suite 300 Sugar Land, TX 77478 COUNSEL FOR EMAGINENET TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Stephen Douglas Henninger Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom 900 Jackson Street, Suite 710 Dallas, TX 75202 COUNSEL FOR FEDCHEX. LLC. /s/ Marvin C. Moos MARVIN C. MOOS 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?