Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.

Filing 144

RESPONSE to 121 Answer to Amended Complaint Antor's Answer to Counterclaims of Sony Pictures, Sony Electronics, Sony Computer, Sony BMG and Grouper Networks by Antor Media Corporation, Antor Media Corporation. (Chiaviello, Robert)

Download PDF
Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc. Doc. 144 Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 144 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, V. METACAFE, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 02:07CV-102 JURY DEMANDED PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT INC, SONY ELECTRONICS INC, SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC, SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GP, AND GROUPER NETWORKS, INC. Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, Antor Media Corporation ("Antor"), replies to Defendants Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment GP, and Grouper Networks, Inc., hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Sony Defendants" as follows: COUNTERCLAIMS PARTIES 1. Antor admits that Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 10202 West Washington Boulevard, Culver City, CA 90232. 2. Antor admits that Sony Electronics Inc. is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 16450 W. Bernardo Street, San Diego, CA 92127. 3. Antor admits that Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having a principal place of Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 144 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 5 business at 919 E. Hillsdale Boulevard, 2nd floor, Foster City, CA 94404. 4. Antor admits that Sony BMG Music Entertainment GP is a general partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 550 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10022-3211. 5. Antor admits that Grouper Network Inc. is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 475 Gate 5 Road #255, Sausalito, CA 94965. 6. Antor admits that it is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Texas with its principal place of business in Plano, Texas. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. Antor admits this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Sony Defendants' counterclaims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338, 2201, and 2202. 8. 9. Antor admits that it has consented to personal jurisdiction of this Court. Antor admits that venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas. COUNTERCLAIMS 10. Antor admits that it claims to own all rights, title and interest in and to the `961 Patent. Any other averments or allegations not admitted herein are denied. 11. 12. Admitted. Admitted. FIRST COUNTERCLAIM: Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement 13. Antor admits that the Sony Defendants incorporate the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 61 of their answer and defenses and paragraphs 1 through 12 of their counterclaims as if fully set forth therein. -2- Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 144 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 3 of 5 14. Denied. SECOND COUNTERCLAIM: Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity 15. Antor admits that the Sony Defendants incorporate the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 61 of the their answer and defenses and paragraphs 1 through 12 of their counterclaims as if fully set forth therein. 16. Denied. THIRD COUNTERCLAIM: Declaratory Judgment of Unenforceability 17. Antor admits that the Sony Defendants incorporate the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 61 of the their answer and defenses and paragraphs 1 through 12 of their counterclaims as if fully set forth therein. 18. Denied. EXCEPTIONAL CASE 19. Denied. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Antor prays for judgment and requests that this Court: (a) (b) (c) (d) Dismiss the Sony Defendants' counterclaims with prejudice; Enter judgment in favor of Antor; Award Antor its reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees; and Grant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. -3- Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 144 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 4 of 5 Respectfully submitted this 27th day of August, 2007. /s/ Robert M. Chiaviello, Jr. Robert M. Chiaviello, Jr., Attorney-in-Charge Texas Bar No. 04190720 Email: bobc@fulbright.com Brett C. Govett Texas Bar No. 08235900 Email: bgovett@fulbright.com FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Dallas, Texas 75201-2784 Telephone: (214) 855-8000 Facsimile: (214) 855-8200 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION OF COUNSEL S. Calvin Capshaw, III Elizabeth L. DeRieux Andrew W. Spangler BROWN McCARROLL L.L.P. 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 Longview, TX 75601 Telephone: (903) 236-9800 Facsimile: (903) 236-8787 Nicholas H. Patton J. Kurt Truelove PATTON, TIDWELL & SCHROEDER, L.L.P. 4605 Texas Blvd. Texarkana, TX 75503 Telephone: (903) 792-7080 Facsimile: (903) 792-8233 T. John Ward, Jr. LAW OFFICE OF T. JOHN WARD, JR., P.C. 109 W. Tyler Longview, TX 75601 Telephone: (903) 757-6400 Facsimile: (903) 757-2323 Otis W. Carroll, Jr. IRELAND CARROLL & KELLEY 6101 S. Broadway, Ste. 500 Tyler, TX 75703 Telephone: (903) 561-1600 Facsimile: (903) 581-1071 -4- Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 144 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A) on August 27, 2007. /s/ Robert M. Chiaviello, Jr. Robert M. Chiaviello, Jr. -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?