Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to first amended complaint up to and including 5/31/2007.. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 4/30/2007. (sm, )

Download PDF
Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc. Doc. 15 Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 14 15 Filed 04/27/2007 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION PLAINTIFF V. (1) METACAFE, INC., (2) GOOGLE, INC., (3) YOUTUBE, INC., (4) SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC., (5) SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., (6) SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC. (7) SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GP, (8) SONY CORPORATION (9) SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA (10) GROUPER NETWORKS, INC., (11) GOTUIT MEDIA CORP., (12) DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., (13) MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS, INC., (14) PURE VIDEO NETWORKS, INC., (15) DIGITAL PLAYGROUND, INC., (16) NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC., (17) SBO PICTURES, INC., (18) VIVID ENTERTAINMENT, LLC (19) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., (20) MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. DEFENDANTS § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07CV102-DF JURY DEMAND ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P.'s ("MLB") Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement is hereby GRANTED. Defendant, MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. shall have until and including May 31, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 14 15 Filed 04/27/2007 04/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 . to answer or otherwise respond in any manner pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable law to Plaintiff's Original Complaint for Patent Infringement. SIGNED this 30th day of April, 2007. ____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?