Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE, INC. AND YOUTUBE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND; re 16 Stipulation filed by Antor Media Corporation, . Signed by Judge David Folsom on 5/3/07. (mrm, )

Download PDF
Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc. Doc. 19 Case Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 16 19 Filed 05/02/2007 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, V. (1) METACAFE, INC., (2) GOOGLE, INC., (3) YOUTUBE, INC., (4) SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC., (5) SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., (6) SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC. (7) SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GP, (8) SONY CORPORATION (9) SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA (10) GROUPER NETWORKS, INC., (11) GOTUIT MEDIA CORP., (12) DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., (13) MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS, INC., (14) PURE VIDEO NETWORKS, INC., (15) DIGITAL PLAYGROUND, INC. (16) NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. (17) SBO PICTURES, INC. (18) VIVID ENTERTAINMENT, LLC (19) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. (20) MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 02:07CV102 JURY DEMAND ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE, INC. AND YOUTUBE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND Before the Court is the Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendants Google and YouTube to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Having considered the matter, the Court GRANTS Dockets.Justia.com Case Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 16 19 Filed 05/02/2007 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 2 . the motion and extends the date for Google and YouTube to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint up to and including June 7, 2007. SIGNED this 3rd day of May, 2007. ____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?