Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT NEW FRONTIER MEDIA INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND; granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; New Frontier Answer due 6/15/07 . Signed by Judge David Folsom on 5/10/07. (mrm, )
Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.
Doc. 39
Case Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF
Document 34 39
Filed 05/09/2007 05/11/2007
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. (1) METACAFE, INC., (2) GOOGLE, INC., (3) YOUTUBE, INC., (4) SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC., (5) SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., (6) SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., (7) SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GP, (8) SONY CORPORATION, (9) SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, (10) GROUPER NETWORKS, INC., (11) GOTUIT MEDIA COPR., (12) DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., (13) MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS, INC., (14) MACMILLAN PUBLISHER, LTD., (15) PURE VIDEO NETWORKS, INC., (16) DIGITAL PLAYGROUND, INC., (17) NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC., (18) SBO PICTURES, INC., (19) VIVID ENTERTAINMENT, LLC (20) SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC. (21) MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION NO. 02:07CV102
JURY DEMAND
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant New Frontier to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Having considered the matter, the Court GRANTS
Dockets.Justia.com
Case Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF
Document 34 39
Filed 05/09/2007 05/11/2007
Page 2 of 2
.
the motion and extends the date for New Frontier to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint up to and including June 15, 2007.
SIGNED this 10th day of May, 2007.
____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6082533 v1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?