Antor Media Corporation v. Metacafe, Inc.

Filing 94

ORDER GRANTING DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWEROR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT; granting 92 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Discovery Communications, Inc. shall have up to and including August 6, 2007, . Signed by Judge David Folsom on 6/26/07. (mrm, )

Download PDF
Case Case 2:07-cv-00102-DF Document 92 94 Filed 06/25/2007 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. METACAFE, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No. 2:07-CV-102 ORDER GRANTING DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Came on to be considered this day Discovery Communications, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. The Court, after reviewing the motion and noting no objection thereto, finds it is well taken and should be GRANTED. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Discovery Communications, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended . Complaint is GRANTED. Further it is ORDERED that Defendant Discovery Communications, Inc. shall have up to and including August 6, 2007, in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. SIGNED this 26th day of June, 2007. ____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?