Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 14

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., Sony DADC US Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Stipulation Extending Answer Date to 8-31-07# 2 Appendix Stipulation - Waiver of Service Sony Corporation# 3 Appendix Stipulation Waiver Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.# 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilcox, Melvin)

Download PDF
Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SONY CORPORATION, SONY ) CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SONY ) COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC., ) SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT ) AMERICA INC., SONY PICTURES ) ENTERTAINMENT INC., SONY ) ELECTRONICS INC. AND SONY DADC ) US INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CERTICOM CORP. AND CERTICOM PATENT HOLDING CORP., Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00216-TJW JURY JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiffs, Certicom Corp. and Certicom Patent Holding Corp. (collectively "Certicom") and Defendants, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., and Sony DADC US Inc. (the "Sony entities"), hereby jointly move for an extension of time until August 31, 2007 for all of the Sony entities to file their Answer or otherwise respond to Certicom's Complaint. Pursuant to the Stipulations attached to this motion, the parties have agreed through their counsel that Sony Corporation and Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., both of whom are Japanese corporations, have agreed to waive service of a summons and any objections regarding the sufficiency of service of process in this action and, based on that agreement, Plaintiffs have NY01 1368132 v1 Dockets.Justia.com agreed to an extension of time for all of the Sony entities to Answer or otherwise respond until August 31, 2007. The parties therefore jointly move for an extension of time. Dated: June 19, 2007 Respectfully submitted, PLAINTIFFS By: /s/ Robert C. Morgan by permission Melvin R. Wilcox, III Robert C. Morgan Laurence S. Rogers ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-8704 Tel: (212) 596-9000 THE ROTH LAWFIRM Carl R. Roth Texas Bar No. 17312000 Michael C. Smith Texas Bar No. 18650410 115 N. Wellington, Suite 200 Texas Bar No. 18650410 Marshall, Texas 75670 Tel: (903) 935-1665 Fax: (903) 935-1797 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Certicom Corp and Certicom Patent Holding Corp. America, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Inc., and Sony DADC US Inc. DEFENDANTS By: /s/ Melvin R. Wilcox, III Melvin R. Wilcox, III Texas Bar No. 21454800 SMEAD ANDERSON & DUNN LLP 2110 Horseshoe Lane Longview, Texas 75605 Tel: (903) 232-1892 Fax: (903) 232-1881 Email: mrw@smeadlaw.com John Flock Michelle Carniaux KENYON & KENYON LLP One Broadway New York, N.Y. 10004-1007 Tel: (212) 425-7200 Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics NY01 1368132 v1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on this the 19th day of June 2007. /s/ Melvin R. Wilcox, III MELVIN R. WILCOX, III NY01 1368132 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?