Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 72

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File SONY'S AGREED-TO MOTION TO EXTEND TIME RELATING TO DAMAGES COMPUTATIONS by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., Sony DADC US Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilcox, Melvin)

Download PDF
Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al Doc. 72 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Certico m Corporation and Certicom Patent Holding Co rporation; Plaintiffs, v. Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony DADC US Inc.; Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-216-TJW UNOPPOSED SONY'S AGREED-TO MOTION TO EXTEND TIME RELATING TO DAMAGES COMPUTATIONS By agreement of the parties, Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony DADC US Inc. (collectively, "Sony") move to extend the time for the "complete computation of any category of damages claimed by any party to the action," as set forth in paragraph 3(c) of the Court's January 22, 2008 Discovery Order from January 5, 2009 to March 2, 2009. Pursuant to the January 22, 2008 Discovery Order entered in this case, the parties would have had until January 5, 2009 to "complete computation of any category of damages claimed by any party to the action, making available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34, the documents or other evidentiary material on which such computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered." There is a large volume of documents and Dockets.Justia.com other materials relevant to this computation that are still in the process of being produced, as well a significant number of depositions being scheduled that may be relevant to this computation. Accordingly, both parties have agreed to extend the aforementioned deadline to March 2, 2009. This extension will not affect any dates in the Discovery Order or Docket Control Order. Dated: November 10, 2008 Respect fully submitted, By: /s/ Melvin R. Wilcox, III Melvin R. Wilcox, III Texas Bar No. 21454800 YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1015 Tyler, TX 75702 Tel: (903) 595-1133 Fax: (903) 595-0191 Email: mrw@yw-lawfirm.co m Attorney for Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by facsimile, electronic mail, and/or first class mail, on this 10th day of November, 2008. /s/ Melvin R. Wilcox, III MELVIN R. WILCOX, III

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?