Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 93

NOTICE of Disclosure by Certicom Corporation, Certicom Patent Holding Corporation Plaintiffs' Notice of Compliance of P.R. 3-1 (Roth, Carl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Certicom Corporation and Certicom Patent Holding Corporation; Plaintiffs, v. Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony DADC US Inc. Defendants. PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE OF P.R. 3-1 Plaintiffs hereby notify the Court that on February 4, 2009, pursuant to Patent Rule 3-1, the Second Amended Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions were served on Defendants. Dated: February 4, 2009 Respectfully submitted, ROPES & GRAY LLP Robert C. Morgan Laurence S. Rogers Khue V. Hoang 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-8704 Telephone: (212) 596-9000 Facsimile: (212) 596-9090 Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-216-TJW _________________________ THE ROTH LAW FIRM Carl R. Roth Texas Bar No. 17312000 Brendan C. Roth Texas Bar No. 24040132 Amanda A. Abraham Texas Bar No. 24055077 115 N. Wellington, Suite 200 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 935-1665 Facsimile: (903) 935-1797 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Certicom Corp. and Certicom Patent Holding Corp. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) this 4th day of February, 2009. Any other counsel of record will be served by facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. _____________________________ Carl R. Roth 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?