Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 97

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, (Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement - P.R. 4-3) by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc., Sony DADC US Inc., Certicom Corporation, Certicom Patent Holding Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilcox, Melvin)

Download PDF
Certicom Corporation et al v. Sony Corporation et al Doc. 97 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) Plaint iffs, ) ) v. ) ) SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SONY ) COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC., ) SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT ) ) AMERICA INC., SONY PICTURES ) ENTERTAINMENT INC., SONY ELECTRONICS INC. and SONY DADC ) ) US INC. ) ) Defendants. CERTICOM CORP. and CERTICOM PATENT HOLDING CORP., Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00216-TJW JURY JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY THE DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Plaint iff Certicom Corporation and Certicom Patent Holding Corporation (collectively, "Certicom") and Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony DADC US Inc. (collectively, "Sony") hereby move to modify the Court's August 18, 2008 Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 62) to extend the date by which the parties must comply with Patent Rule 4-3. Pursuant to the Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 62) entered in this case, the parties would have until March 4, 2009 to complete and file a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement in compliance with P.R. 4-3. The parties have exchanged proposed terms and claim elements for construction and have exchanged preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence and now seek one additional week to complete the Joint Claim Construction and 3783661_1.DOC Dockets.Justia.com Prehearing Statement. Accordingly, both parties have agreed to extend the aforementioned deadline to March 11, 2009. This extension will not affect any other dates in the Discovery Order or Docket Control Order. Dated: February 27, 2009 Respect fully submitted, By:/s/ Melvin R. Wilcox, III Melvin R. Wilcox, III Texas Bar No. 21454800 YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1015 Tyler, TX 75702 Tel: (903) 595-1133 Fax: (903) 595-0191 Email: mrw@yw-lawfirm.co m Attorney for Defendants 3783661_1.DOC Dated: February 27, 2009 Respect fully submitted, By:/s/ Carl R. Roth (by permission Melvin R. Wilcox, III) THE ROTH LAW FIRM Carl R. Roth Texas Bar No. 17312000 Brendan C. Roth Texas Bar No. 24040132 Amanda A. Abraham Texas Bar No. 24055077 115 N. Wellington, Suite 200 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 935-1665 Facsimile: (903) 935-1797 Robert C. Morgan Laurence S. Rogers Khue V. Hoang ROPES & GRAY LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-8704 Telephone: (212) 596-9000 Facsimile: (212) 596-9090 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Certicom Corp. and Certicom Patent Holding Corp. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed and/or served electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on February 27, 2009. /s/ Melvin R. Wilcox, III MELVIN R. WILCOX, III 3783661_1.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?