Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 172

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Palm, Inc., identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Stevens, Scott)

Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Doc. 172

Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW

Document 172

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MINERVA INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No: 2-07-CV-0229 TJW JURY

DEFENDANT PALM, INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Palm, Inc. ("Palm") states: 1. 2. Palm has no parent corporation and is itself a publicly held corporation. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of Palm's stock.

-1-

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW

Document 172

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 2 of 3

Dated: January 7, 2008

Respectfully submitted, _/s/ Scott E. Stevens_________________________ Scott E. Stevens Texas State Bar No. 00792024 STEVENS LAW FIRM P.O. Box 807 Longview, Texas 75606 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT PALM, INC.

Of Counsel: Mark D. Flanagan (admitted pro hac vice) Christine E. Duh (admitted pro hac vice) Anna T. Lee (admitted pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] E-Mail: [e-mail] Paul B. Keller (admitted pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]

-2-

Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW

Document 172

Filed 01/07/2008

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically on January 7, 2008, in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by facsimile on this same date.

/s/ Scott E. Stevens_________________________

-3-