Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 84

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Utstarcom, Inc., identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Smith, Melissa)

Download PDF
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al Doc. 84 Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW Document 84 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MINERVA INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. MOTOROLA, INC., ET AL. Defendants. C.A. No. 2:07-CV-229 TJW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEFENDANT UTSTARCOM, INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Defendant UTStarcom, Inc., by and through its attorneys, hereby submits the following disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1: Goldman Sachs Asset Management (US) owns 10% or more of UTStarcom, Inc.'s stock. Goldman Sachs Asset Management is not publicly traded, but its affiliate, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is. No other publicly traded corporation owns 10% or more of UTStarcom, Inc.'s stock. UTStarcom, Inc. has no parent corporation. Dated: October 12, 2007 Respectfully submitted, GILLAM & SMITH, LLP /s/ Melissa R. Smith State Bar No. 24001351 Harry L. Gillam, Jr. State Bar No. 07921800 GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P. 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW Document 84 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 2 Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT UTSTARCOM, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on this 12th day of October, 2007. /s/ Melissa R. Smith

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?