Wolf v. Brightroom, Inc. et al

Filing 3

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric M. Albritton on behalf of Peter H. Wolf (Albritton, Eric)

Download PDF
Wolf v. Brightroom, Inc. et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00238-DF Document 3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PETER H. WOLF § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § BRIGHTROOM, INC.; ISLAND § PHOTOGRAPHY, INC.; ELIZABETH § M. KREUTZ; BIRD'S EYE VIEW § INC.; DIGILABS, INC.; PRINTROOM § INC.; SMUGMUG, INC.; AND HOUR § PHOTOS, INC., D/B/A MASTER § PHOTOS U.S.A. § § Defendants. § Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-238-TJW Jury Trial Demanded NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Peter H. Wolf, plaintiff in the above-entitled and numbered civil action, hereby notifies the Court and all parties that the following person, in addition to those who previously gave notice, is appearing as counsel of record. Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) ema@emafirm.com 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00238-DF Document 3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 2 Respectfully submitted, ______________________________ Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) ema@emafirm.com Counsel for Peter H. Wolf CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email, on this the 15th day of June, 2007. ____________________________ Eric M. Albritton 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?