Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al

Filing 19

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 7 Amended Complaint [Unopposed] by The Washington Post Company. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al Doc. 19 Att. 1 Case 2:07-cv-00263-TJW-CE Document 19 Filed 07/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC. v. BLOCKDOT, INC., CAREERBUILDER, LLC, CNET NETWORKS, INC., DIGG, INC., EBAUM'S WORLD, INC., JABEZ NETWORKS, INC., THE NEW YORK TIMES CO., THE WASHINGTON POST CO., THE WEATHER CHANNEL INTERACTIVE, INC. CASE NO. 2:07-cv- 263[TJW-CE] Jury Trial Demand ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THE WASHINGTON POST CO.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant THE WASHINGTON POST CO., without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b) or any other rule or law, filed its unopposed motion to extend its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until and through September 4, 2007. Such motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant THE WASHINGTON POST CO. has until and through September 4, 2007 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. {A07\7820\0001\W0330953.1 } Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?