Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al

Filing 59

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Jabez Networks, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Geiszler, Steven) Modified by clerk to add corporate parent on 9/5/2007 (mpv, ).

Download PDF
Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Blockdot, Inc. et al Doc. 59 Case 2:07-cv-00263-TJW-CE Document 59 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BLOCKDOT, INC., CAREERBUILDER, LLC., CNET NETWORKS, INC., DIGG, INC., EBAUM'S WORLD, INC., JABEZ NETWORKS, INC., THE NEW YORK TIMES CO., THE WASHINGTON POST CO., THE WEATHER CHANNEL INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendants. JABEZ NETWORKS, INC.'S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Jabez Networks, Inc. ("Jabez") states that Jabez is a nongovernmental corporate party in the abovecaptioned action. Jabez is not owned by a parent corporation; nor does any publicly held corporation own 10% or more of Jabez's stock. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-263 (TJW/CE) Jury Trial Demand Case 2:07-cv-00263-TJW-CE Document 59 Filed 09/04/2007 Page 2 of 2 DATE: September 4, 2007 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Mark N. Reiter Mark N. Reiter Texas Bar No. 16759900 Steven M. Geiszler Texas Bar No. 24032227 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 698-3100 Facsimile: (214) 571-2900 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JABEZ NETWORKS, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on September 4, 2007 pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail on this same date. /s/ Steven M. Geiszler Steven M. Geiszler 100292591_1.DOC -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?