Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 139

ORDER granting 121 Motion to Expedite briefing. In light of the re-scheduling of the claim construction hearing for August 25, 2009, the court sets the following briefing schedule for the motion to compel (Dkt. No. 133). Response Due: August 12, 2009. Reply Due: August 18, 2009. Sur-Reply Due: August 24, 2009 at 12:00 p.m. The court will hear oral argument on Google, Inc.s motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 120) and Function Medias motion to compel (Dkt. No. 133) at the conclusion of the claim construction hearing. Each side will be given 20 minutes to argue its respective position. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 7/31/09. (ehs, )

Download PDF
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 139 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C. vs. GOOGLE, INC. AND YAHOO!, INC. § § § § § § ORDER Pending before the court is Function Media, LLC's motion to expedite briefing (Dkt. No. 121) pertaining to its concurrently filed motion to compel (Dkt. No. 133). The court grants the motion in part. In light of the re-scheduling of the claim construction hearing for August 25, 2009, the court sets the following briefing schedule for the motion to compel (Dkt. No. 133). Response Due: Reply Due: Sur-Reply Due: August 12, 2009 August 18, 2009 August 24, 2009 at 12:00 p.m. CASE NO. 2:07-CV-279-CE The court will hear oral argument on Google, Inc.'s motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 120) and Function Media's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 133) at the conclusion of the claim construction hearing. Each side will be given 20 minutes to argue its respective position. SIGNED this 31st day of July, 2009. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?