Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 148

NOTICE by Function Media, L.L.C. re 110 Reply to Claim Construction Brief Notice of Supplemental Authority for Function Media's Markman Briefs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Grinstein, Joseph)

Download PDF
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF'TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FLINCTION MEDIA, L.L.C. Plaintiffs. vs. Civil Action No. 2007 -CV -279 GOOGLE, INC. AND YAHOO, INC. Defendants. ruRY TzuAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY F'OR F'UNCTION MEDIA'S MARKMAN BRIEFS On August 10, 2009, after claim construction briefing was complete, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Davis, J.) issued an opinion that directly relates to the construction of the means plus function claim limitations that are before the Court. That opinion, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 2460982 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10,2009). I, is IP Innovation, LLC v. Red Hat, lnc.,2009 WL The entire IP Innovation opinton discusses the question of indefiniteness. Pages *9 through *t2, ín particular, address the issue of indefiniteness as it relates to means plus function limitations and the proper application of the recent Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc. decision from the Federal Circuit. IP Innovation supports the arguments and authorities regarding indefiniteness in Function Media's Opening Claim Construction Brief (in particular, pages 4 to 19) and in Function Media's Reply Claim Construction Brief (in particular, pages 1 to 6 andpages 17 to23). 9644 02v | / 08 426 - 0 | 0020 Dockets.Justia.com Respectfully submitted, /s/ Joseph S. Grinstern Max L. Tribble, Jr. State Bar No. 20213950 Email : mtribble@susmangodfrey.com SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas, 77002 Telephone: (7 13) 651-9366 Facsimile: (7 13) 654-6666 Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs OF COUNSEL: Joseph S. Grinstein State Bar No. 24002188 Aimée Robert State Bar No.24046729 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77 002-5096 Telephone j : (7 13) 651-9366 Fax: (713) 654-6666 grinstein@ susman godfrev. com arobert@ susmangodfr e)¡. com Jeremy Brandon State Bar No. 24040563 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. Suite 5100 901 Main Street Dallas, Texas 7 5202-377 5 Telephone : (21 4) 7 5 4-1900 Fax: (214) 754-1933 jú andon@s usman go dfr ey. com Justin A. Nelson State Bar No.24034766 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. Suite 3800 964 402v I / 0 8 426 -0 1 0020 1201 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98 1 0 1 -3000 Telephone: (206) 5 16-3880 Fax: (206) 516-3883 j nelson@ susmangodfrey. com Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 Charles Ainsworth PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Suite I114 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 53 1-3535 Fax: (903) 533-9687 rcbunt@pbatyler.com charley@pbatyler.com S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 037839000 Elizabeth L. DeRieux State Bar No. 05770585 D. Jeffrey Rambin CAPSHAW DERIEUX. LLP Energy Centre 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 P.O. Box 3999 (75606-3999) Longview, TX 7 5601-5157 Telephone: (903) 236-9800 Fax: (903) 236-8787 ccapshaw@ capshawlaw. com ederieux@ cap shawlaw. com j rambin@capshawlaw. com Otis Carroll State Bar No. 03895700 Collin Maloney State Bar No. 00794219 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Telephone: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 oti scarroll@icklaw. com cmaloney@icklaw.com 9 64 402v I /08426-0 I 0020 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE hereby certify that on August 17,2009,I electronically filed the foregoing document with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, using the electronic filing system of the court. The electronic case filing system sent a "Notice of Electronic Filing" to the following attorneys of record who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means: /s/ Joseph S. Grinstein Joseph S. Grinstein I 964 402v 1 I 08426 - 0 I 0020

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?