Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 171

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 146 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Regarding Google's Inequitable Conduct Allegations by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gillam, Harry)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, LLC. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., ET AL Defendants. § § § § § § § § § No. 2:07cv279-CE JURY TRIAL DEMANDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GOOGLE INC. files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in which to File Its Response to Function Media's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Regarding Google's Inequitable Conduct Allegations--[Docket No. 146]), and in support of same would show the Court as follows: 1. Plaintiff Function Media its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Regarding Google's Inequitable Conduct Allegations on August 17, 2009. 2. Defendant Google Inc. and Plaintiff have agreed to extend the deadline for Google Inc. to file its Response up to and including September 11, 2009. 3. Extension of this deadline is not for the purposes of delay and such extension will not alter any other deadline. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant Google Inc. prays that the Court grant this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time by extending the time period for Google Inc. to file its Response up to and including September 11, 2009. Dated: September 3, 2009 Respectfully submitted, GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P. /s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr. State Bar No. 07921800 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 gil@gillamsmithlaw.com CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant have conferred and Plaintiff does not oppose this motion. __/s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr. ___________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 3, 2009, the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this notice was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission and/or first class mail on this same date. /s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?