Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 273

ORDER granting 270 Motion for Extension of Time to File Surreply. Google's Surreply in Opposition to Function Media's motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct due by 11/20/2009 Replies on Dispositive Motions and Motions in Limine due by 11/23/2009. Deadline for Function Media's Inequitable Conduct Expert Report due 11/25/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 11/19/09. (ehs, ) Modified on 11/20/2009 to clarify order text(ehs, ).

Download PDF
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 273 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C., Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. GOOGLE, INC. AND YAHOO!, INC. Defendants. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE, GOOGLE'S INEQUITABLE CONDUCT SURREPLY AND FUNCTION MEDIA'S INEQUITABLE CONDUCT EXPERT REPORT Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines For Reply Briefs In Support of Dispositive Motions and Motions In Limine, Google's Inequitable Conduct Surreply and Function Media's Inequitable Conduct Expert Report. After considering the Motion, the relief requested therein, and the fact that it is joint, the Court finds that for good cause appearing the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The deadline for Google's Surreply in Opposition to Function Media's Motion for Civil Case No. 2:07-CV-279 (CE) Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct will be November 20, 2009. 2. The deadline for Replies on Dispositive Motions and Motions in Limine will be November 23, 2009. 3. The deadline for Function Media's Inequitable Conduct Expert Report will be November 25, 2009. Dockets.Justia.com SIGNED this 19th day of November, 2009. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?