Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 469

ORDER - The court, sua sponte, VACATES its earlier order and DENIES Googles motion. Googles confidentiality concerns are adequately addressed by sealing the portions of the transcript that contain sensitive information. Accordingly, Google may file a motion to seal that identifies unsealed portions of the transcript that contain confidential information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 4/12/10. (ehs, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C. vs. GOOGLE INC. AND YAHOO, INC. § § § § § ORDER On March 1, 2010, the court entered an order (Dkt. No. 453) granting the defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google") motion to redact trial transcripts (Dkt. No. 452). The court, sua sponte, VACATES its earlier order and DENIES Google's motion. Google's confidentiality concerns are adequately addressed by sealing the portions of the transcript that contain sensitive information. Accordingly, Google may file a motion to seal that identifies unsealed portions of the transcript that contain confidential information. SIGNED this 12th day of April, 2010. CASE NO. 2:07-CV-279 ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?