Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 484

ORDER granting in part 477 Motion to Redact. ORDERED that the court reporter redact the following passages from all publicly available versions of the trial transcripts. re 433 Transcript,,, 431 Transcript,,, 432 Transcript,,, 430 Transcript,,, 436 Transcript,,, 429 Transcript,,, The request to seal the preceding portions of the trial transcripts is DENIED as moot, as the court reporter has been instructed to redacte those passages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 10/25/2010. (ch, )

Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Doc. 484

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C. Plaintiff, vs. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. § § § § § § § § §

Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-279

ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE'S UNOPPOSED AMENDED MOTION TO REDACT PORTIONS OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS Defendant Google, Inc. ("Google") moved for an order to redact certain portions of the transcripts from the jury trial held between January 19 through 26, 2010. (Dkt. 427-37.) Google timely filed notice of its intent to request redaction on February 9, 2009. (Dkt. 442.) Plaintiff Function Media, LLC ("Function Media") does not oppose Google's motion. After considering the Motion and the relief requested therein, the Court finds that for good cause appearing the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED in part. It is ORDERED THAT the court reporter redact the following passages from all publicly available versions of the trial transcripts: Dkt. No. 429 430 430 430 430 430 Date Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Session Morning Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Start 101:2 62:4 "Applied... 63:24 "Overture..." 65:7 "the..." 66:7 "the..." 66:9 "makes... End 108:11 62:6 64:10 65:8 "...percent" 66:7 "...percent." 66:10 "...exactly."

Dockets.Justia.com

Dkt. No. 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 431 431 431 431 431 432 432 433 433 433 433 436 436

Date Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 20, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 21, 2010 Jan. 22, 2010 Jan. 22, 2010 Jan. 22, 2010 Jan. 22, 2010 Jan. 25, 2010 Jan. 25, 2010

Session Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Afternoon Morning Morning Morning Morning Morning Afternoon Afternoon Morning Morning Morning Morning Afternoon Afternoon

Start 136:19 137:19 138:12 138:21 "the..." 139:10 "that..." 140:1 144:7 147:6 149:2 150:15 48:4 48:11 49:1 100:5 101:12 6:9 "It..." 20:14 15:3 16:21 19:14 20:25 97:1 "and..." 98:8 "and..."

End 137:12 138:2 138:18 138:21 "...figure" 139:13 142:3 146:17 147:18 149:25 151:1 48:6 48:13 49:8 101:4 103:1 6:9 "...million." 20:16 15:12 18:11 20:6 21:4 97:2 "...acquisition" 98:9 "...rate"

The request to seal the preceding portions of the trial transcript is DENIED as moot, as the court reporter has been instructed to redact those passages.

SIGNED this 25th day of October, 2010.

___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE