Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting 58 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Deadline is extended to 7/30/08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 6/30/08. (ch, )

Download PDF
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC. and YAHOO!, INC., Defendant. JURY DEMANDED Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-279-CE ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND PRIVILEGE LOG DEADLINES AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION DEADLINES BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants Google Inc. and Yahoo!, Inc.'s (collectively, "Defendants") Unopposed Motion to Extend Privilege Log Deadlines and Document Production Deadlines, filed on June 27, 2008. After considering the Motion, the relief requested therein, and the fact that it is unopposed, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the current privilege log deadlines in this case from the Court's Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 45) are changed as follows: September 29, 2008 Letter to the Court stating that there are no disputes as to claims of privileged documents (if there are no such disputes) Privilege Logs to be exchanged by parties. July 30, 2008 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the document production deadline from paragraph 3(b) of the Court's Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 44) is changed from June 30, 2008 to July 30, 2008, with the understanding that Defendants each will make an initial production of documents to Plaintiff on June 30, 2008 as well. Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Privilege Log Deadlines and Document Production Deadlines--Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com SIGNED this 30th day of June, 2008. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Privilege Log Deadlines and Document Production Deadlines --Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?