Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 84

RESPONSE in Opposition re 79 MOTION for Protective Order Barring Discovery of Non-Accused Products filed by Function Media, L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tribble, Max)

Download PDF
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA LLC Plaint iff, vs. GOOGLE INC. AND YAHOO!, INC. Defendants. Civil Action No. 2007-CV-279 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF FUNCTION MEDIA LLC'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant Yahoo!, Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order is improper and should be denied for the reasons set forth in Plaintiff Function Media LLC's Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant Yahoo!, Inc. (filed April 13, 2009). See Docket No. 83. Function Media's Motion to Compel Discovery specifically addresses the arguments that Yahoo! raises in its Motion for a Protective Order. See id. at pp. 8-13. Rather than repeat Function Media's responses herein, Function Media incorporates by reference its Motion to Compel and accompanying brief. A proposed order is attached. Respect fully submitted, /s/ Max L. Tribble, Jr. _______________________________________ Max L. Tribble, Jr. State Bar No. 20213950 Email: SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas, 77002 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 Lead Attorney for Plaintiff 1 OF COUNSEL: Joseph S. Grinstein State Bar No. 24002188 Email: SUSMAN GODFREY LLP 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 Fax: (713) 654-6666 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing will be served via ECF on all counsel of record, this 13th day of April, 2009. /s/ Jeremy J. Brandon _______________________________________ Jeremy J. Brandon 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?