Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 88

ORDER granting Google Inc and Yahoo! Inc's 66 Motion for Leave to File supplement to PR 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures. That Google Inc. and Yahoo!, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and accompanying document production served on Plaintiff by October 29, 2008 are deemed by the Court to be a part of Defendants Invalidity Contentions in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 4/27/09. (ehs, )

Download PDF
Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 88 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C., v. GOOGLE, INC. AND YAHOO!, INC. Civil Case No. 2:07-cv-279 (CE) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC. AND YAHOO!, INC.'S JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FURTHER SUPPLEMENT THEIR P. R. 3-3 AND 3-4 DISCLOSURES Before the Court is Defendants Google Inc. and Yahoo!, Inc.'s Joint Motion for Leave to Further Supplement their P.R. 3-3 and P.R. 3-4 Disclosures, filed on October 31, 2008. After reviewing the Motion for Leave, the Response in Opposition thereto, the evidence submitted, and any further briefing, the Court finds that the Motion for Leave should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants Google Inc. and Yahoo!, Inc.'s Joint Motion for Leave to Further Supplement their P.R. 3-3 and P.R. 3-4 Disclosures, filed on October 31, 2008, is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Google Inc. and Yahoo!, Inc.' Second Supplemental Invalidity s Contentions and accompanying document production served on Plaintiff by October 29, 2008 are deemed by the Court to be a part of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions in this case. SIGNED this 27th day of April, 2009. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?