Oakley et al v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. et al

Filing 147

MEMORANDUM ORDER - The undersigned has reviewed Judge Everinghams report and recommendation and the defendants objections. The undersigned overrules the defendants objections and adopts the findings and conclusions contained in Judge Everinghams rep ort and recommendation. Accordingly, the court denies the defendants motions (Nos. 20 and 44) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue or, in the alternative, a motion to transfer venue. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/29/08. (ch, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROBERT B. OAKLEY, ET AL. v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., ET AL. § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-351 MEMORANDUM ORDER The above-titled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of the defendants' motions (Nos. 20 and 44) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue or, in the alternative, a motion to transfer venue, have been presented for consideration. The defendants have filed an objection to the report and recommendation. The undersigned has reviewed Judge Everingham's report and recommendation and the defendants' objections. The undersigned overrules the defendants' objections and adopts the findings and conclusions contained in Judge Everingham's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the court denies the defendants' motions (Nos. 20 and 44) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue or, in the alternative, a motion to transfer venue. SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2008. __________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?