Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 140

ORDER granting 139 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Deadline extended to 10/14/08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 8/19/08. (ehs, )

Download PDF
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 140 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC F/K/A POLARIS IP, LLC v. GOOGLE, INC., et al. NO. 2:07-CV-371-TJW-CE JURY ORDER The Court, having considered the Consent Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines and Allow For Amendment of the Parties' Infringement and Invalidity Contentions, hereby GRANTS the motion. It is therefore ORDERED as follows: (1) The parties' time to comply with the Court's mandatory disclosure requirements under Paragraph 3 of the Court's Discovery Order is extended 60-days until October 14, 2008. (2) Defendants will provide supplemental responses to Bright Response's First Set of Interrogatories, including the identification of documents by bates ranges, subject to each of the Defendants' General and Specific Objections by October 14, 2008. (3) Within 60-days after the production of source code, if any, Plaintiff may supplement its Infringement Contentions with respect to the produced source code. Plaintiff's supplementation shall comply with Section II, P.R. 3-1(h) of Appendix C from the Court's Standard Discovery Order. 1 Dockets.Justia.com (4) Within 60-days after Plaintiff serves its amended Infringement Contentions pursuant to paragraph (3) above, each Defendant opposing a claim of patent infringement may serve supplemental Invalidity Contentions pursuant to Section II, P.R. 3-3(f) of Appendix C from the Court's Standard Discovery Order. SIGNED this 19th day of August, 2008. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?