Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 230

ORDER - the court orders Yahoo to comply with the protective order currently in place (Dkt. No. 134), and specifically Section 10(c), which states in part, The Producing Party shall make available a laser printer with commercially reasonable printing speeds for on-site printing during inspecti of the code. The court will address Yahoos motion for protective order modification (Dkt. No. 222) at a later date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 11/18/09. (ch, )

Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Doc. 230

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC vs. GOOGLE, INC., ET AL. § § § § § ORDER On November 17, 2009, the parties informed the court that a dispute had arisen regarding the defendant Yahoo!, Inc.'s ("Yahoo") failure to provide a printer to the plaintiff Bright Response, LLC's ("Bright Response") expert during her source code review. The court orders Yahoo to comply with the protective order currently in place (Dkt. No. 134), and specifically Section 10(c), which states in part, "The Producing Party shall make available a laser printer with commercially reasonable printing speeds for on-site printing during inspection of the code." The court will address Yahoo's motion for protective order modification (Dkt. No. 222) at a later date.

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-371-CE

SIGNED this 18th day of November, 2009.

___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com