Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
301
MOTION (Request Regarding Trial Date) by AOL, LLC., Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Jennifer)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § §
No. 2:07-cv-00371-CE JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions of Defendants Google Inc. and AOL, LLC (collectively "Defendants"). Having considered the Motion, which preserves Plaintiff Bright Response, LLC's right to challenge the sufficiency of the Supplemental Invalidity Contentions under Patent Rule 3-3, the Court finds the Motion to be well taken. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions.
SIGNED this 31st day of March, 2010.
___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
