Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 405

ORDER granting 401 Motion for Leave to Supplement its Infringement Contentions as to AOl. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 7/7/2010. (ch, )

Download PDF
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 405 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC v. GOOGLE INC., et al. NO. 2:07-CV-371-CE JURY ORDER On this day the Court considered the motion of Plaintiff Bright Response, LLC ("Bright Response") in which Bright Response seeks leave to supplement its infringement contentions ("Motion") as to AOL LLC and America Online, Inc. (collectively "AOL") to assert claims 28, 30, 31, 33 and 38 of the `947 patent. Bright Response agrees that this supplementation of its contentions as to AOL will not constitute any material change in the scope of this case or any product accused of infringement (specifically, it will add no new allegations not already brought against AdWords or an AOL branded version of AdWords). While AOL does not oppose this motion, it is agreed that this is without prejudice to AOL's rights to dispute the sufficiency of the supplemented contentions (which as of the date of this stipulation have yet to be served) or their compliance with the terms of this stipulation. In exchange for AOL's agreement to not oppose this motion, Bright Response agrees that it will not seek any further discovery from AOL, including but not limited to further 30(b)(6) deposition discovery. Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion should be granted. It is hereby ORDERED that the Court grants Bright Response leave to supplement its infringement contentions as to AOL as set forth above. . Dockets.Justia.com SIGNED this 7th day of July, 2010. ___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?