Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 588

ORDER - The court issues this supplemental order on motions in limine to address the motions that were carried in the courts previous order (Dkt. No. 571). Bright Response's Motions in Limine 6. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court will allow Dr. Branting to testify about the facts disclosed in his dissertation, but he may not go further as a fact witness than what is revealed in the document itself. 10. GRANTED. 11. GRANTED. 32. a. DENIED. b. DENIED. c. GRANTED. d. DENIED. 33. DENIED. Defendants Joint Motions in Limine 7. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court will allow evidence of lump sum licenses to the patent-in-suit entered in settlement in support of the defendants damages model.8. DENIED. This motion is denied as a motion in limine, but the court will not allow the plaintiff to offer evidence inconsistent with its 30(b)(6) witnesses testimony or its assertion of privilege. Yahoos Motions in Limine 3. DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 8/2/10. (ehs, )

Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Doc. 588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC vs. GOOGLE INC., ET AL. § § § § § ORDER The court issues this supplemental order on motions in limine to address the motions that were carried in the court's previous order (Dkt. No. 571). Bright Response's Motions in Limine 6. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court will allow Dr. Branting to testify about the facts disclosed in his dissertation, but he may not go further as a fact witness than what is revealed in the document itself. 10. 11. 32. GRANTED. GRANTED. a. b. c. d. 33. DENIED. DENIED. GRANTED. DENIED.

CASE NO. 2:07-CV-371-CE

DENIED.

Defendants' Joint Motions in Limine 7. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court will allow evidence of lump sum licenses to the patent-in-suit entered in settlement in support of the defendants' damages model.

Dockets.Justia.com

8.

DENIED. This motion is denied as a motion in limine, but the court will not allow the plaintiff to offer evidence inconsistent with its 30(b)(6) witnesses' testimony or its assertion of privilege.

Yahoo's Motions in Limine 3. DENIED.

SIGNED this 2nd day of August, 2010.

___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE