Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
595
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 485 Sealed Motion; granting in part and denying in part 505 Sealed Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 8/3/10. (ehs, )
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC vs. GOOGLE INC., ET AL.
§ § § § § ORDER
CASE NO. 2:07-CV-371-CE
Pending before the court are the defendant Yahoo! Inc.'s motion to exclude (Dkt. No. 485) and the defendant Google, Inc.'s motion to exclude (Dkt. No. 505) the testimony and opinions of the plaintiff Bright Response, LLC's damages expert, Stephen Becker. The defendants' motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court sustains Yahoo's objection to the application of the Google-Stanford license in calculating damages against Yahoo. The remainder of the defendants' objections are denied; these objections go to the weight, not admissibility of Mr. Becker's opinions and may be addressed through cross-examination.
SIGNED this 3rd day of August, 2010.
___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
