Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
597
ORDER denying 526 Sealed Motion to exclude the opinions of Mary A Woodford regarding lump sum royalty. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham on 8/3/10. (ehs, )
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC vs. GOOGLE INC., ET AL.
§ § § § § ORDER
CASE NO. 2:07-CV-371-CE
Pending before the court is the plaintiff Bright Response, LLC's motion to exclude the opinions of Mary A. Woodford regarding lump sum royalty (Dkt. No. 526). The court DENIES the motion to exclude. The plaintiff's objections go to the weight, not admissibility of Ms. Woodford's opinions and may be addressed through cross-examination.
SIGNED this 3rd day of August, 2010.
___________________________________ CHARLES EVERINGHAM IV UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
