Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
612
NOTICE by Yahoo!, Inc. re 610 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity (Notice of Joinder in Google's Motion For Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity) (Doan, Jennifer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE LLC Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., YAHOO!, INC., AOL LLC, and AMERICA ONLINE, INC., Defendants. § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-371-CE § § § § §
NOTICE OF JOINDER IN GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON INVALIDITY Defendant Yahoo! hereby files this Notice of Joinder in Google's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity (Dkt. No. 610). This Notice of Joinder hereby provides notice that Yahoo! fully adopts the arguments presented in the motion. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jennifer H. Doan Jennifer H. Doan Texas Bar No. 08809050 Joshua R. Thane Texas Bar No. 24060713 HALTOM & DOAN 6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100 Texarkana, TX 75503 Telephone: (903) 255-1000 Facsimile: (903) 255-0800 Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com Email: jthane@haltomdoan.com Jason C. White Mansi Shah Scott Sherwin HOWREY LLP 321 N. Clark, Suite 3400 Chicago, IL 60654
NOTICE OF JOINDER Page 1
Tel: 312.595.1239 Fax: 312.595.2250 Email: whitej@howrey.com Email: shahm@howrey.com Email: sherwins@howrey.com William C. Rooklidge HOWREY, LLP 4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700 Irvine CA 92614-2559 Telephone: (949) 721-6900 rooklidgew@howrey.com ATTORNEYS FOR YAHOO!, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). All other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by certified mail, return receipt requested, on this the 7th day of August, 2010.
/s/ Jennifer H. Doan
NOTICE OF JOINDER Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?