Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 623

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham: Jury Trial Day Four held on 8/5/2010. (Court Reporter Judy Werlinger, CSR.) (jml)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE LLC VS. GOOGLE, INC., ET AL. ' ' ' ' ' CASE NO. 2:07-CV-371(CE) Jury Trial Day Four Minutes August 5, 2010 OPEN: 8:36 a.m. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: ADJOURN: 6:51 p.m. Andrew Spangler Marc Fenster David Pridham Alex Giza John Hueston Charles Verhoeven Amy Candido David Perlson William Rooklidge Jason White Brian Smith Jim Warriner Eric Hansen Judy Werlinger, CSR Jan Lockhart ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS: LAW CLERK: COURT REPORTER: COURTROOM DEPUTY: 8:36 a.m. Court opened. Mr. Verhoeven conducted cross examination of Dr. Becker. 9:01 a.m. Mr. Rooklidge conducted further cross examination of Dr. Becker. 9:38 a.m. Mr. Houston conducted re-direct examination of Dr. Becker. 10:11 a.m. Morning recess. Jury excused. 10:32 a.m. Mr. Verhoeven conducted re-cross examination of Dr. Becker. 10:38 a.m. Video depositions shown by Plaintiff of Witness Yeh and Croxall. Minutes August 5, 2010 Page Two 10:44 a.m. Video depositions shown by Defendant of Witness Yeh and Croxall. 10:49 a.m. Mr. Houston called Mr. Sheafe to testify. Mr. Sheafe was previously sworn. 11:18 a.m. Ms. Doan conducted cross examination of Mr. Sheafe. 11:59 a.m. Jury excused for lunch break. 12:00 p.m. Hearing outside the presence of the jury regarding violations of court rulings on motions in limine. 12:03 p.m. Lunch recess until 1:10 p.m. 1:01 p.m. Hearing outside the presence of the jury regarding court's ruling on violations on motions in limine. 1:09 p.m. Court break 1:15 p.m. Jury returned to courtroom. 1:16 p.m. Mr. Houston conducted re-direct examination of Mr. Sheafe. 1:17 p.m. The parties passed the witness. The Plaintiff 1:18 p.m. Mr. Verhoeven called Jeff Huber to testify. Mr. Huber was sworn and examined under oath. 1:52 p.m. Mr. Fenster conducted cross examination of Mr. Huber. 2:02 p.m. The parties passed the witness. Next, Mr. Perlson called Bartholomew Furrow to testify. Mr. Furrow was sworn and examined under oath. 2:32 p.m. Mr. Fenster conducted cross examination of Mr. Furrow. 2:48 p.m. Mr. Perlson conducted re-direct examination of Mr. Furrow. 2:52 p.m. Mr. Fenster stated he had no further questions. 2:53 p.m. Mr. Perlson called Ed Fox to testify. Mr. Fox was previously sworn and was examined under oath. Minutes August 5, 2010 Page Three 3:02 p.m. Jury excused until 3:25 p.m. 3:03 p.m. Hearing outside the presence of the jury. Court admitted exhibits pertaining to Williams documents and gave instructions with respect to their use. 3:06 p.m. Court recess. 3:30 p.m. Mr. Perlson continued his direct examination of Dr. Fox. 3:57 p.m. Bench conference 3:59 p.m. Mr. Perlson continued his examination of Dr. Fox. 4:25 p.m. Mr. Perlson passed the witness. 4:26 p.m. Mr. Fenster conducted cross examination of Dr. Fox. 4:30 p.m. Bench conference. 4:33 p.m. Mr. Fenster continued cross examination of Dr. Fox. 4:34 p.m. Bench conference. 4:36 p.m. Jury excused. Hearing outside the presence of the jury regarding electronic message. 4:47 p.m. Jury returned to courtroom. Mr. Fenster continued his examination of Dr. Fox. 5:10 p.m. Ms. Doan called Keith Nielson to testify. Mr. Nielson was previously sworn and was examined under oath. 5:29 p.m. Ms. Doan passed the witness. 5:30 p.m. The Court gave the jury instructions regarding deliberations. courtroom. The jury left the 5:32 p.m. The Court heard Judgments as a Matter of Law (JMOL). Mr. Perlson argued on behalf of Google. The Court responded. 5:49 p.m. Ms. Candido presented JMOL on behalf of Google as to damages. The Court responded. Minutes August 5, 2010 Page Four 6:00 p.m. Mr. White presented JMOL on behalf of Yahoo!. The Court responded. 6:50 p.m. Court adjourned.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?