Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
625
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham: Jury Trial held on 8/7/2010. (Court Reporter Judy Werlinger, CSR.) (jml)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE LLC VS. GOOGLE, INC., ET AL. § § § § §
CASE NO. 2:07-CV-371(CE)
OPEN: 8:00 a.m.
Jury Trial Day Six Minutes August 7, 2010 ADJOURN: 12:15 p.m. Andrew Spangler Marc Fenster David Pridham Alex Giza John Hueston Charles Verhoeven Amy Candido David Perlson William Rooklidge Jason White Brian Smith Jim Warriner Eric Hansen Judy Werlinger, CSR Jan Lockhart
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF:
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS:
LAW CLERK:
COURT REPORTER: COURTROOM DEPUTY:
8:00 a.m. Court opened. Hearing outside the presence of the jury regarding Judgments as a Matter of Law and the Court's Instructions to the Jury. Mr. Spangler, Mr. Pridham and Mr. Fenster presented argument/objections on behalf of Plaintiff. Mr. Smith and Ms. Candido presented argument/objections on behalf of Defendants. 8:35 a.m. Court adjourned.
Page 2 Minutes August 7, 2010
9:06 a.m. Court opened for the purpose of closing arguments. Mr. Fenster and Mr. Hueston presented closing argument on behalf of Plaintiff. Mr. Verhoeven and Mr. Rooklidge presented closing argument on behalf of Defendants. Court gave its final instructions to the jury. The jury retired to the jury room for deliberations. 12:10 p.m. Received Note from Jury. Jury request to return to deliberate on Monday, August 9, 2010 at 8:30 a.m.. Court final instructions to jury. 12:15 p.m. Court adjourned.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?