Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 129

NOTICE of Disclosure by Yahoo! Inc. Regarding PR 3-3 and 3-4 (Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 129 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and A9.COM, INC., Defendants. DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE REGARDING PR 3-3 AND 3-4 NOW COMES Defendant Yahoo! Inc. and hereby notifies the Court that on August 6, 2008, Yahoo! Inc. served, by electronic mail upon all counsel of record, its disclosure requirements pursuant to Patent Rules 3-3 and 3-4 according to the May 14, 2008 Amended Docket Control Order and July 29, 2008 Order in this matter. Dated: August 8, 2008 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Michael E. Jones Michael A. Jacobs Rachel Krevans Richard S.J. Hung Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 268-7000 (415) 268-7522 (FAX) Michael E. Jones Texas State Bar No. 10929400 mikejones@potterminton.com John F. Bufe Texas State Bar No. 03316930 johnbufe@potterminton.com Potter Minton Case No. 2:07-cv-432 (LED/JDL) {A07\7854\0004\W0371653.1 } Dockets.Justia.com A Professional Corporation P.O. Box 359 (75710) 110 N. College Ave. 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: 903.597.8311 Facsimile: 903.593.0846 Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO! INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on August 8, 2008. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones {A07\7854\0004\W0371653.1 }2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?