Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Yahoo!, Inc. deadline is extended to 11/21/07 . Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 10/23/07. (ch, )

Download PDF
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 23 Case Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED Document 20 23 Filed 10/22/2007 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC. § § v. § § GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, § MICROSOFT CORPORATION, § YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, § INC., and A9.COM, INC. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-cv-432[LED] JURY DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant YAHOO! INC., without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b) or any other rule or law, filed its unopposed motion to extend its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until and through November 21, 2007. Such motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant YAHOO! INC. has until and through November 21, 2007 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23rd day of October, 2007. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE {A07\NEW\NEW\W0341470.1 } Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?