Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 266

MOTION for Extension of Time to File re: summary judgment motion briefing schedule, joint pretrial order, joint proposed jury instructions, form of the verdict, proposed finding of fact and conclusions of law, notice of request for daily transcript or real time reporting of the court by Performance Pricing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lyon, Richard)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC., v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:07-cv-432 (LED) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and A9.COM, INC., Defendants. Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines Plaintiff Performance Pricing, Inc. and Defendants Google Inc. and AOL LLC respectfully file this Joint Motion seeking the extension of the summary judgment motion briefing schedule as follows: · Regarding Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, filed November 18, 2009, Plaintiff's Oppositions would be due December 21, 2009, and Defendants' Replies would be due January 11, 2010. · Regarding Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment, filed November 23, 2009, Defendants' Oppositions would be due December 28, 2009, and Plaintiff's Replies would be due January 18, 2010. The parties also request that the current deadline (January 12, 2010) for the Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions, Form of the Verdict, Proposed Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and the Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting of the Court, be extended to January 22, 2010. This extension would give the parties time to complete the necessary briefing. 1 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Performance Pricing, Inc. and Defendants Google Inc., AOL LLC respectfully request that this Court extend the deadlines as outlined above. Dated: December 11, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Richard E. Lyon Richard E. Lyon CA State Bar No. 229288 Email: rick@dovellaw.com Gregory S. Dovel CA State Bar No. 135387 Email: greg@dovellaw.com Sean Luner CA State Bar No. 165443 Email: sean@dovellaw.com Dovel & Luner, LLP 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: 310-656-7066 Facsimile: 310-657-7069 S. Calvin Capshaw State Bar No. 03783900 Elizabeth L. DeRieux State Bar No. 05770585 Capshaw DeRieux, L.L.P. Energy Centre 1127 Judson Road, Ste 220 P. O. Box 3999 (75606-3999) Longview, Texas 75601-5157 Telephone: (903) 236-9800 Facsimile: (903) 236-8787 Email: capshaw@capshawlaw.com Email: ederieux@capshawlaw.com Robert M. Parker State Bar No. 15498000 Email: rmparker@cox-internet.com Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 Email: cbunt@cox-internet.com Parker & Bunt, P.C. 100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114 2 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: 903/531-3535 Facsimile: 903/533-9687 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC. DATED: December 8, 2009 /s/ Jamie Lisagor Jamie Lisagor jamielisagor@quinnemanuel.com Charles K. Verhoeven charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com David A. Perlson davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Jennifer A. Kash jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Antonio R. Sistos antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com Emily C. O'Brien emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.875.6600 Facsimile: 415.875.6700 David J. Beck Texas Bar No. 00000070 dbeck@brsfirm.com Michael E. Richardson State Bar No. 24002838 mrichardson@brsfirm.com Beck, Redden & Secrest, L.L.P. One Houston Center 1221 McKinney St., Suite 4500 Houston, TX. 77010 (713) 951-3700 (713) 951-3720 (Fax) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this 11th day of December, 2009, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Richard E. Lyon Richard E. Lyon 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?