Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 282

ORDER AMENDING DOCKET CONTROL ORDER - the deadlines set forth herein are amended as follows, all other deadlines contained in the Docket Control Order remain the same. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 12/29/09. (ch, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:07-cv-432-RRR JURY TRIAL DEMANDED GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC, Defendants. Dockets.Justia.com ORDER AMENDING DOCKET CONTROL ORDER It is ORDERED that the following mddifications to the Docket Control Order are hereby entered until further order of this court: Former Date January 22, 2010 Amended Date January 19, 2010 ~ January 19, 2010 Description Surreplies to Defendants' Summary Judgment motions Replies to Plaintiff's Summary Judgment motions Oppositions to Plaintiffs Summary Judgment motions January 18, 2010 December 28, 2009 December 30, 2009 All other deadlines contained in the Docket Control Order, and any amendments thereto, remain the same. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 29th day of December, 2009. (`lb I) UNITED STATES by designation) JUDGE (sitting IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC. Plaintiff, V. Case No. 2:07-cv-432-RRR JURY TRIAL DEMANDED GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES Before the Court is Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines. The Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that~%4.EL Regarding Plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment, filed November 23, 2009, Defendants' Oppositions shall be due December 30, 2009, and Plaintiffs Replies shall be due January 19, 2010. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 29th day of December, 2009. "1P'.ITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE (sitting (uoTwuThsap Xq

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?