Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Yahoo! Inc. deadline is extended to 12/7/07. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/26/07. (ch, )

Download PDF
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 38 CCase 2:07-cv-00432-LED Document 37-2 ase 2:07-cv-00432-LED-JDL Document 38 Filed 11/21/2007 Page 1 1 of 1 Filed 11/26/2007 Page of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC. § § v. § § GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, § MICROSOFT CORPORATION, § YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, § INC., and A9.COM, INC. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-cv-432[LED] JURY DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant YAHOO! INC., without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b) or any other rule or law, filed its unopposed motion for an additional extension of its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until and through December 7, 2007. Such motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant YAHOO! INC. has until and through December 7, 2007 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of November, 2007. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE {A07\7854\0004\W0343839.1 } Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?