Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 91

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Discovery and Docket Control Orders by Google Inc., A9.com, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., AOL LLC, Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bufe, John)

Download PDF
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 91 Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED-JDL Document 91 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and A9.COM, INC., Defendants. Case No. 2:07-cv-432 (LED) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Unopposed DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PROPOSED DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL ORDERS TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: COMES NOW, Defendants GOOGLE, INC., AOL, LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, YAHOO!, INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and A9.COM, INC. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants") to file this their Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Discovery and Docket Control Orders, and for their Motion would respectfully show to the Court the following: The current deadline to file a proposed Discovery Order and Docket Control Order is April 21, 2008. Defendants respectfully request a seven (7) day extension of time to and including April 28, 2008 in which to file their proposed Discovery and Docket Control Orders. The additional time will increase the chances that the two (2) proposed Orders will be agreed. Counsel for Defendants has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff. oppose the Motion. Plaintiff does not 1 {VRT\7854\0004\W0363866.1 } Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED-JDL Document 91 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 2 of 4 WHEREFORE, ABOVE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants respectfully request that their Motion be granted, and that the deadline to file proposed Discovery and Docket Control Orders be extended from April 21, 2008 to and including April 28, 2008. Dated: April 16, 2008 Respectfully submitted, POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation By: /s/ John F. Bufe JOHN F. BUFE Texas State Bar No. 03316930 johnbufe@potterminton.com P.O. Box 359 (75710) 110 N. College Ave. 500 Plaza Tower Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: 903.597.8311 Facsimile: 903.593.0846 Morrison & Foerster, LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Attorneys for Defendant YAHOO!, INC. /s/ Jeffrey S. Love KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 E.W. Salmon St., Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: 503-595-530 Facsimile: 503-595-5301 Attorneys for Defendant A9.COM, INC. 2 {VRT\7854\0004\W0363866.1 } Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED-JDL Document 91 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 3 of 4 /s/ Jennifer a. Kash QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.875.6600 Facsimile:415.875.6700 Attorneys for Defendant AOL, LLC /s/ Jennifer A. Kash QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.875.6600 Facsimile:415.875.6700 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE, INC. /s/ Jennifer A. Kash QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 50 California St., 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-875-6600 Facsimile: 415-875-6700 Attorneys for Defendant IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC. /s/ Richard A. Cederoth SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP One South Dearborn Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: 312-853-7000 Facsimile: 312-853-70363 Attorneys for Defendant MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3 {VRT\7854\0004\W0363866.1 } Case 2:07-cv-00432-LED-JDL Document 91 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on April 16, 2008. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. /s/ John F. Bufe John F. Bufe 4 {VRT\7854\0004\W0363866.1 }

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?