Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Filing 277
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Defendants motion that Dr. Freemans untested speculation about Cordiss experiments be inadmissible is DENIED as moot. Defendants Daubert Motion No. 2 is DENIED # 183 . Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Portions of the Defendants Expert Reports that are Based Upon Claim Construction Other Than the Courts Claim Constructions (Dkt. No. 193)granted in part and denies in part. Plaintiffs Motion to Preclude Defendants Expert, Dr. Atwood, from Offering Testimony Regarding Anticipation and Dr. Saffrans Alleged Misrepresentations to the PTO (Dkt. No. 194)GRANTS-in-part and CARRIES the remainder of this Motion. Plaintiffs Motion to Preclude Defendants Damages Expert, Christopher Bakewell, from Referencing, or Relying On, the Saffran v. Boston Scientific Corp. Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 195)denied as moot. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 1/20/11. (ehs, )
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
